Ashok Asaram Korke v. Sunita Raju Korke And ANR

rpa 1/1 revn-536-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI. REVISION APPLICATION NO.536 OF 2016 Ashok Asaram Korke .. Applicant Vs.

Sau. Sunita Raju Korke & Anr.

.. Respondents ......

Mr.Manoj Badgujar, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms.Nalanda A. Jadhav, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mrs.N.S. Jain, APP for the Respondent - State. ......

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATED :

JULY 20, 2018.

P.C. :

For the reasons to be recorded separately, I pass the following order:

:: O R D E R ::

(i) Criminal Revision Application is dismissed;

(ii) At this stage, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that there is an interim order granted in favour of the applicant, which may be continued for a period of four weeks from today, as the applicant is likely to decide whether he should challenge the order before the Higher Court. In view of this, the interim order granted earlier shall continue to operate for a period of four weeks from today.

Digitally signed by Rajeshri Prakash Aher Date:

2018.08.01 15:16:38 +0530 (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) Rajeshri Prakash Aher