Kumar Krishna Pillai v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 17-BA-3959-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.3959 OF 2021 Kumar Krishna Pillai .... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra .... Respondent .......

• Mr.Aditya Sharma, Advocate for Applicant.

• Smt. Sharmila S. Kaushik, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 17th JANUARY 2022 (through video conferencing) P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned APP makes a statement that the statement of accused u/s 313 of Cr.P.C. is already recorded and only the final arguments are to be heard.

2.

Considering this situation, learned counsel for the Digitally signed by MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Date:

2022.01.19 14:27:05 +0530 Applicant does not press this application. He only requests that MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR the trial Court be directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible.

Nesarikar

2 / 2 17-BA-3959-21.odt 3.

Considering both these submissions, the application is allowed to be withdrawn as not pressed. However, the trial Court is requested to hear the final arguments as early as possible and to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible. 4.

With these observations, the application is disposed of. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)