Piyush Chandulal Dagha And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 ABA.1688-2016 Dond

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1688 OF 2016 Piyush Chandulal Dagha & Ors.

..Applicants Vs.

State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1429 OF 2016 Chetan Vithaldas Mehta .

..Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra ..Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1434 OF 2016 Shailesh Sevantilal Shah ..Applicant Vs.

State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ----- Mr. Girish Kulkarni i/b Amit Ghag for applicants in ABA Nos.1688/2016 & 1429/2016.

Mr. S.G. Deshmukh a/w R.D. Suryawanshi for applicant in ABA 1434/2016.

Mr. Dilip Pawar for Intervener.

Mrs. Jyoti S. Lohokare, APP for State.

-----

2/2 ABA.1688-2016 CORAM: A.S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 3rd May 2017.

P.C.

1] In the aforesaid applications the applicants were granted interim relief by Orders dated 29.9.2016, 19.8.2016 and 19.8.2016 respectively.

2] The record reveals that in pursuance of Order dated 18th April 2017, the applicants have deposited Rs.1,12,53,851/- in the Registry of this Court. The record of investigation reveals that the documents pertaining to the present crime are already seized by the police. The investigation of the present crime revolves around the documents which are seized by the police. In view thereof, the custodial interrogation of the applicants for further investigation of the present crime is not necessary. 3] In view of the above, the interim reliefs granted by the aforesaid Orders are hereby confirmed.

4] The Applications are allowed in the aforesaid terms. (A.S. GADKARI,J.)