← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10451/2013rule made absolute

Shri. Nilesh Sakharkar And ORS. v. M/S. Vista Processed Foods Pvt. Ltd. And ORS.

2015-01-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar2 pages

-: 1 :- wp.10451.13 ingale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10451 OF 2013 Shri Nilesh Sakharkar and others .. Petitioners Vs.

M/s.Vista Processed Foods Pvt.Ltd., and others .. Respondents Mr.Rahul D.Oak, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms.N.R.Patankar a/w Mr.Mr.V.P.Sawant, Advocate for Respondents. CORAM : R.G.KETKAR, J.

DATE : 23rd JANUARY, 2015 P.C. :

.

Not on board. At the request of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, taken up on board. 2.

Heard Mr.Rahul D.Oak, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Ms.N.R.Patankar, learned Counsel for the respondents. Rule. Ms.Patankar waives service for respondents. At the request and by consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, rule is made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up for final disposal.

3.

The learned Counsel for the parties have tendered the Memorandum of Settlement dated 20/01/2015 entered into under section 2(p) read with section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act,

-: 2 :- wp.10451.13 1947 and Rules 62 of the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957. The learned Counsel for the parties further state that the impugned order may be set aside and the petition may be disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement. Memorandum of Settlement dated 20/01/2015 is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Mr.Oak states that all the petitioners are present in the Court and he has tendered photocopies of their identify cards which are taken on record and marked 'Y' collectively for identification. 4.

In view of the Memorandum of Settlement, the impugned order dated 28/08/2012 passed by the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No. 65 of 2008 is set aside.

5.

By consent of the parties, petition is disposed of in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 21/01/2015. 6.

Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

(R.G.KETKAR, J.)