Shri.Jalindar Ambadas Badale v. Ahmed Gudar Mujawar

19. cas 1811.16.doc Urmila Ingale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1811 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO.27200 OF 2016 Shri Jalindar Ambadas Badale .. Applicant Vs.

Ahmed Gudan Mujawar and ors.

.. Respondents Mr.Sharad T.Bhosale, for the Applicant Mr.Amol Dhumal i/b Mr.Umesh Kurund, for Respondents No. 2 & 3.

CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.

DATE : 28th JUNE, 2019 P.C. :

.

In terms of order dated 18/01/2018 passed by this Court in Civil Application No. 1811 of 2016 in Second Appeal Stamp No. 27200 of 2016, Assistant Registrar, Second Appeal Branch submitted report on 09/03/2018. I have gone through the explanation. The same appears to be satisfactory. The explanation is accepted.

1/2

19. cas 1811.16.doc 2.

Learned Counsel for the respondents seeks leave to delete respondents No. 4 to 17. Leave is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

3.

Learned Counsel appears on behalf of respondents No.2 & 3. From the office record, it appears that respondent No.1 refused to accept the service. Respondent No.1 is therefore duly served.

4.

This is an application for condonation of 202 days in filing Second Appeal. The application is opposed by learned Counsel for the respondents No.2 & 3.

5.

For the reasons mentioned in paragraphs 9 & 10 of the application, the application deserves to be allowed. Delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Civil Application is disposed of.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) 2/2