Ramchandra W. Patil Through Priyanka Patil v. The State Of Mahrashtra

habeeb 15 (2)-appp-827-2016.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 827 OF 2016 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1222 OF 2016 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 822 OF 2016 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1222 OF 2016 Ramchandra W. Patil ...

Applicant Intervener

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Mr. Nooruddin Latif Naik ...

Rspdnt No. 1 Orig. Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents .....

Mr. Kunal Bhosale i/b. R. J. Rathod for the Applicant. Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP for the State.

Mr. Jagdish Reddy for Respondent No. 2.

Mr. Hemant Ingale i/b. Prashant Goyal for Applicant in APPP 822/16 & APPP 827/16.

Mr. D. R. Sangale, Chunabhatti Police Station, Mumbai - present. ....

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 30.09.2016.

P.C.:

This is an Application for intervention by the alleged witness in C.R. No. 127 of 2016 registered with Chunnabhatti Police Station, Mumbai. The First Information Report is lodged by Shri Vibhav Eknath Bandal Deputy Engineer, presently attached to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Mumbai. The Applicant claims to be a witnesses in the present crime. In view of the settled position of the law

habeeb 15 (2)-appp-827-2016.odt and in persuance of the provisions of the Cr.P.C, if the Applicant is desirous to assist the investigating agency in any manner, it is imperative for him to approach the investigating officer and or the investigating agency and to record the statement with a view to facilitate the investigation of the present crime. The Applicant is neither the informant nor the complainant. The Applicant has no locus standi. The Application is misconceived and is dismissed in liminae. (A. S. GADKARI, J.)