← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10193/2018rejected

Arti Vilas Athavale v. The Secretary, Raosaheb Balaram Dnyandeo Thakur Vidya Mandir , Mulund And Orss

2018-09-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai2 pages

Chittewan 1/2

919. WP 10193-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10193 OF 2018 Arti Vilas Athavale ...

Petitioner

Versus

The Chief Executive Officer Raosaheb Balaram Dnyandeo Thakur Vidya Mandir And Others ...

Respondents .....

Mr. Shailendra Pandse for the Petitioners.

Mr. Nasir M. Shaikh for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ms. Kavita N. Salunkhe, AGP for Respondent Nos.4 and 5. .....

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ DATE : 14 SEPTEMBER 2018 P.C. :

1] The Petitioner challenges departmental equiry proceedings initiated against her. The charges are framed against the Petitioner on 14 May 2018. Not only that, after the charges were framed, eighteen meetings of the Enquiry Committee have been held, in which the Petitioner has already been participated.

2] We do not find that any interference in the departmental enquiry is warranted in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition is rejected.

Chittewan 2/2

919. WP 10193-18.doc 3] It is clarified that right of the Petitioner in taking recourse to the remedy available in law is kept open, in the event outcome of the departmental enquiry is against her.

[M.S. KARNIK, J.] [B.R. GAVAI, J.] Rajesh Vasant Chittewan by Rajesh Vasant Chittewan Date: 2018.09.19 12:42:14 +0530