Samson Henry Pinto v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

14-aba-1906-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1906 OF 2019 Samson Henry Pinto .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ______ Mr. Niranjan Mundargi a/w. Jay S. Patil i/b. Gaurav Thote for Applicant.

Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for State/Respondent. ______ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 07th AUGUST, 2021 P.C. :

1.

In this case, learned APP, on instructions of the investigating agency, makes a categorical statement that the investigating agency does not want to arrest the applicant. The statement is recorded and accepted. Based on this statement, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application and seeks unconditional withdrawal of this application. 2.

Permission is granted. The application is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally and is disposed of as such. Digitally signed by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:

2021.08.07 17:35:47 +0530 3.

It is made clear that, if in future, in connection with VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Gokhale

: 2 :

14-aba-1906-19.odt this offence the investigating agency or the trial court decides to arrest the applicant, they shall give four clear working days notice to the applicant to enable him to approach a proper forum for appropriate relief.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)