Rohini Atul Bhatt v. Manjula Kalyanji Bhatt And ORS

1 905 CAW 2395-14 in WP 531-14.doc Sequeira

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2395 OF 2014.

IN WRIT PETITION NO. 531 OF 2014 Rohini Atul Bhat.

.. Applicant / Petitioner Vs.

Manjula Kalyanji Bhatt & ors. .. Respondents. Mr.Neel G.Helekar, for the Applicant.

None for Respondents.

CORAM: N.M.Jamdar, J.

Saturday 18 April, 2015 P.C :

This Application is taken out by the original Petitioner to bring heirs of Respondent No.2 on record. The heirs of Respondent No.2 have filed their reply. None present on behalf of Respondent No.2(a) to 2(c). Perused the reply. It is stated that these Respondents have no objection if they are brought on record but Applicant has not explained the delay. The learned counsel for the Applicant states that after intimation was received from the Advocate for Respondents, application was immediately filed. The reason given is satisfactory. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks.

(N.M.Jamdar, J.)