Mahasidha Sidhanna Chougule v. The State Of Maharashtra

by LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN Date: 2021.12.02 10:04:01 +0530 LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN

(907) cri.IA-2856.21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2856 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1006 OF 2017 Mahasidha Sidhanna Chougule : Applicant/Orig. Accused No.1.

versus The State of Maharashtra : Respondent Ms. Chandani Chawla i/by Dr. Yug Mohit Choudhry for the Applicant. Mr. V B Konde-Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM : S. S. SHINDE, N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATE : 01st December 2021 P.C.

Heard Ms. Chandani Chawla, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant and Mr. V B Konde-Deshmukh, the learned APP appearing for the Respondent/State.

The present Applicant-Original Accused No.1, who, along with Original Accused Nos.2, 7, 8 and 13, has preferred Criminal Appeal bearing No.1006 of 2017, seeks liberty to file a separate Appeal. For the reasons assigned in the Interim Application No.2856 of 2021, the same stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The Applicantlgc

(907) cri.IA-2856.21.odt Original Accused No.1 is permitted to file separate Appeal. The Appeal Memo in Criminal Appeal No.1006 of 2017 be amended accordingly. The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks permission to dispense with filing of separate vakalatnama. In the Appeal which is to be filed on behalf of the Applicant-Original Accused No.1, the Vakalatnama filed in this Application, is continued as the Vakalatnama in the Appeal to be filed on behalf of the Applicant-Original Accused No.1. The Interim Application No.2856 of 2021 stands disposed of accordingly. [N. J. JAMADAR, J] [S. S. SHINDE , J] lgc