The State Of Maharashtra v. Umesh Sitaram Goyal And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 650 OF 2015 [For condonation of delay] IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. OF .

[for leave to appeal] The State of Maharashtra.

..Applicant.

Versus

Umesh Sitaram Goyal & Another.

..Respondents.

Mrs. M. M. Deshmukh, APP for the Applicant.

Ms. Vrushali L. Maindad i/b A. A. Desai for Respondent No. 1. Coram : Ranjit More & Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, JJ.

Date : December 1, 2016.

P. C. :

1.

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 1 states that Respondent No.1 has expired. In view of the statement, application is abated as against Respondent No.1. So far as Respondent No. 2 is concerned, the record shows that he has been served.

2.

Heard learned APP for the State. Perused the application. We find that in paragraph Nos. 2 to 5, State has explained the delay of 24 days occurred in filing application for leave to appeal. The present application is therefore allowed as against Respondent No.2 by condoning delay. Application stands disposed of. [Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 1 / 1