Shri. Ajay Hirachand Birajdar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary And ORS

dgm 1 21-wp-11617-16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11617 OF 2016 Kum. Snehal Chandrakant Patil .... Petitioner vs The State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary and ors.

.... Respondents ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION No. 11618/2016 Shri Sangramsing P. Shelake ....

Petitioner vs.

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

.....

Respondents AND ALONG WITH WRIT PETITION No. 11619/2016 Shri Ajay Hirachand Birajdar ....

Petitioner vs.

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

.....

Respondents Mr. Abhijit M. Adagule for the petitioners in all matters. Mrs. R.M. Shinde, AGP for respondents 1 to 4. Mr. S.R. Ganbavale for respondents 5 and 6.

CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

DATE : September 27, 2017 FINAL ORDER:

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent.

1/2

dgm 2 21-wp-11617-16.sxw The statement is made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties that the Petitioners case is fully covered and governed by a Division Bench order of this Court dated 1.8.2017 in Writ Petition No.10133/2016-Mrs. Shivanee Prasanna Deshpande vs. The State of Maharahtra & ors along with companion matters. The learned AGP concede to this position also. Therefore, as the facts and circumstances and position of law is similar, we are inclined to dispose of the writ petitions, on similar lines by granting prayer (b).

Rule made absolute accordingly.

No costs.

(BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) 2/2