Deepak Namdeo More And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

14-APPA-1234-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1234 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1037 OF 2015 DEEPAK NAMDEO MORE )...APPLICANT V/s.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

)...RESPONDENTS Mr.Kirtimala Kamble, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.A.R.Kapadnis, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

P. N. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

17th OCTOBER 2016.

P.C. :

Issue notice to respondents. Learned APP accepts notice on behalf of respondent - State.

Heard learned counsel for applicant. This application is filed for permission to replace surety furnished by applicant contending that on being ordered to be released on bail, applicant has furnished his surety namely Vishwanath Namdeo More. However, as said surety avk 1/2

14-APPA-1234-2016.doc wants to sell property of which solvency certificate is issued, prays that applicant be allowed to furnish some other surety by discharging Vishwanath More. It is also contended that one Sandeep Doke is ready to stand as surety for applicant.

Record reveals that applicant's sentence came to be suspended by this court by its order dated 27th October 2015 and he is ordered to be released on bail.

Considering facts as aforesaid, applicant Deepak Namdeo More is allowed to substitute his surety, by producing Sandeep Doke as his substituted surety and till the process of acceptance of new surety Sandeep Doke is complete, Vishwanath More shall continue as applicant's surety.

Application is disposed of as allowed, in above terms. (P. N. DESHMUKH, J.) avk 2/2