← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10927/2015dismissed

Mr. Behzad Marzaban Irani v. Mr. Jehangir Dinshaw Moriabad/Irani And ORS

2022-03-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

(5)-WP-10927-15.doc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date: 2022.03.25 15:31:32 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO.10927 OF 2015 Mr. Behzad Marzaban Irani ..Petitioner

Versus

Mr. Jehangir Dinshaw Moriabad/Irani and Ors.

..Respondents Mr. Rohan Surve i/by Kunal Naik, for the Petitioner. Mr. Dormaan J. Dalal, for the Respondent No.1. Mr. P. P. Pujari, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 21st MARCH, 2022 P.C.

1.

Heard.

2.

Along with advocate Mr. Madhav Jamdar, as he then was (now Hon'ble Judge of this High Court), advocate Mr. Kunal Naik and Mr. Rohan Surve have entered their appearance. 3.

When the last time matter was listed before this Court, advocate Mr. Kunal Naik sought time to take instructions from the petitioner.

4.

Today, when the matter is called out, Mr. Rohan Surve informs that the petitioner has intimated advocate Mr. Kunal Naik, so also advocate Mr. Rohan Surve not to appear in the matter. BGP.

(5)-WP-10927-15.doc.

5.

The aforesaid fact reflects that the petitioner has appropriate notice of engaging the counsel as his earlier counsel was elevated to the bench. The petitioner has not taken any steps in the matter. As such, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition.

6.

That being so, petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] BGP.