Mr. Manoj Deepchand Rajbhar v. Mrs. Kavita Manoj Rajbhar

24.341.15 CAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 341 OF 2015 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO. 27463 OF 2015 MR. MANOJ DEEPCHAND RAJBHAR ..APPLICANT Vs.

MRS. KAVITA MANOJ RAJBHAR ..RESPONDENT Shri. Rakesh Agarwal for the Applicant Mr. Anil Chauhan for the Respondent CORAM :

R. M. SAVANT, J & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATE :

22nd JUNE, 2017 P.C.

The above Civil Application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 96 days in filing the above FCA. The reasons therefore are mentioned in paragraph nos. 5 to 8 of the Civil Application. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent opposes the application on the ground that no sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of the said delay. Having regard to the reasons set out in the said paragraphs, they can be said to be the plausible reasons for the delay of 96 days occurring in the filing of the FCA. Case for exercise of discretion is therefore made out. ism

24.341.15 CAM Civil Application is allowed. Resultantly the delay of 96 days in filing the above FCA stands condoned. The Civil Application stands disposed of. List the FCA for admission after 5 weeks. Ad-interim order, if any to continue till the next date.

[SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.] [R.M.SAVANT, J] ism