← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10081/2009disposed off

Rau Nan Salunke Deceased Jagannath Rau Salunke And ORS. v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer No. (6) Pune And ORS.

2021-10-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni2 pages

by VIDYA SURESH AMIN Date:

2021.10.06 12:49:16 +0530 VIDYA SURESH AMIN 13.WP10081_2009.doc Vidya Amin IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 10081 OF 2009 Rau Nan Salunkhe (Deceased), through LRs.

Jagannath Rau Salunkhe & Ors.

...

Petitioners vs.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer No. 6, Pune & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10082 OF 2009 Gorakhnath Baburao Gutal ...

Petitioner vs.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer No. 6, Pune & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10083 OF 2009 Baba Fatubhai Mulani (Decd.) through LRs.

Chandulal Babu Mulani (Decd.) through Peermohammed Chandulal Mulani & Ors.

...

Petitioners vs.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer No. 6, Pune & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10084 OF 2009 Vasant Dhondopant Ajotikar (Decd.) through LRs Anil Vasantrao Ajotikar & Anr.

...

Petitioners vs.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer No. 6, Pune & Ors.

... Respondents Mr. Gaurav Potnis i/b. Ms. Pallavi H. Potnis for the petitioners. Mr. A.P. Vanarase, AGP for the State.

CORAM :- G. S. KULKARNI, J.

DATE :- OCTOBER 5, 2021

13.WP10081_2009.doc PC :- 1.

The challenge in these writ petitions is to an order passed by the Collector rejecting the petitioners' applications filed under section 28A(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. 2.

Mr. Potnis, learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that the issues as raised in these petitions are squarely covered by a decision dated 14 September, 2021 rendered by this Court on a batch of petitions in Sambhaji Vikram Gutal vs. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Pune & Ors. (Writ Petition No. 6747 of 2009) & other connected matters. Mr. Vanarase, learned AGP has also not disputed such position and is agreeable that these petitions be disposed of in terms of the said judgment. 3.

Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are disposed of in terms of the judgment of this Court in Sambhaji Vikram Gutal (supra). The petitioners hence would be entitled to the benefit of the operative order passed by this Court and more particularly as contained in paragraph 27(i) to (v) of the said judgment. 4.

Writ Petitions are allowed in the above terms. No costs. (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)