Mr. Parag Rameshchandra Shah v. Citibank N. A. And ORS.

1 /1 Nalawade

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO. 10833 OF 2015 Parag R.Shah.

...Petitioner.

vs.

CITY Bank NA and ors.

...Respondents.

None for the petitioner.

Mr. Pritvish Shetty i/by Manilal Kher Ambalal & Co. for Respondent No.1.

CORAM :ANOOP V. MOHTA & A.S. GADKARI, JJ.

DATE : 28th November, 2016 ORDER:

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank makes a statement that the parties have filed consent terms where the petitioner is also one of the signatory before the DRT. Therefore, nothing survives in the petition. Petition is accordingly disposed of as settled outside the court. (A.S.GADKARI, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)