Sweta Krishna v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR
BHAGYAWANT TATYARAO PUNDE 1/2 904-WP-4509-2019+.doc BHAGYAWANT TATYARAO PUNDE Date: 2021.08.18 18:47:53 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4509 OF 2019 Captain P.S. Chandavarkar
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4510 OF 2019 Rajiv Chandok
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4533 OF 2019 Sweta Krishna
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4534 OF 2019 Thomas Samuel
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
Bhagyawant Punde
2/2 904-WP-4509-2019+.doc ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4532 OF 2019 B.K. Sinha
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
...Respondents
...
Ms. Pooja Khandeparkar i/by. Mr. Ruturaj P. Pawar for Petitioner in all petitions.
Mr. Yogendra Pratap Singh for Respondent No. 2 in all petitions. Smt. A.S. Pai, PP for State.
...
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2021.
P.C.:
1.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2.
We have carefully perused the reliefs claimed in the petition. In our considered view an alternate efficacious remedy of revision is available to the petitioners for redressal of their grievance. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to invoke the extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Hence, without adjudication on merits, all the petitions stand disposed of, 3.
Needless to observe that, the petitioners, if advised, may avail of an appropriate remedy, as available in law.
( N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.) Bhagyawant Punde