← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4534/2019disposed off

Thomas Samuel v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2021-08-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar2 pages

BHAGYAWANT TATYARAO PUNDE 1/2 904-WP-4509-2019+.doc BHAGYAWANT TATYARAO PUNDE Date: 2021.08.18 18:47:53 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4509 OF 2019 Captain P.S. Chandavarkar

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4510 OF 2019 Rajiv Chandok

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4533 OF 2019 Sweta Krishna

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4534 OF 2019 Thomas Samuel

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

Bhagyawant Punde

2/2 904-WP-4509-2019+.doc ALONG WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4532 OF 2019 B.K. Sinha

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

...

Ms. Pooja Khandeparkar i/by. Mr. Ruturaj P. Pawar for Petitioner in all petitions.

Mr. Yogendra Pratap Singh for Respondent No. 2 in all petitions. Smt. A.S. Pai, PP for State.

...

CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.

DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2021.

P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2.

We have carefully perused the reliefs claimed in the petition. In our considered view an alternate efficacious remedy of revision is available to the petitioners for redressal of their grievance. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to invoke the extraordinary writ jurisdiction. Hence, without adjudication on merits, all the petitions stand disposed of, 3.

Needless to observe that, the petitioners, if advised, may avail of an appropriate remedy, as available in law.

( N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (S. S. SHINDE, J.) Bhagyawant Punde