Shailesh Sangatha Yadav v. The State Of Maharashtra

BA 2203-17.odt Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2203 OF 2017 Shailesh Sangatha Yadav .Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. Mateen Shaikh a/w Mr. Sharif Shaikh, Mr. Sajid Qureshi & Ms Shruti Vaidya, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs. Rutuja Ambekar, APP, for the Respondent - State

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

12.04.2018 P.C.

.

After arguing for some time when this Court was not inclined to enlarge the Applicant on bail, learned counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw this Application with the request to expedite the trial of the Applicant, considering his age. Accordingly, the Application is dismissed as withdrawn. The trial of the Applicant is expedited. Learned Judge shall conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible and preferably within nine months from the date of receipt of this order. If for no fault of the Applicant the trial does not conclude within the stipulated period, the Applicant is at liberty to file a fresh Application.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)