Dr. Sau. Hitanshi Vijay Chavala v. Dr. Shri. Vijay Dayaram Chavala And ANR

44-REVN-560-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.560 OF 2016 DR.SAU HITANSHI VIJAY CHAVALA )...APPLICANT V/s.

DR.SHRI VIJAY DAYARAM CHAVALA & ANR.)...RESPONDENTS Mr.G.R.Agarwal, Advocate for the Applicant.

Ms.Sangeeta Salvi i/b. Ms.Seema Sarnaik, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

Ms.V.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

A. M. BADAR, J.

DATE :

13th FEBRUARY 2017.

P.C. :

What is challenged in this revision petition is an order upsetting ad-interim exparte order passed by the learned trial Magistrate and the direction to the learned trial Magistrate to decide the application for interim relief (Exhibit 5) on hearing both the parties.

avk 1/2

44-REVN-560-2016.doc It is reported that ultimately the application for interim relief at Exhibit 5 has been decided. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in the revision petition. The same is disposed of accordingly. (A. M. BADAR, J.) avk 2/2