← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4558/2019others disposed off

Sartaj Khan Mumtaj Khan Pathan v. The State Of Maharashtra

2019-10-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari2 pages

32-WP-45582019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4558 OF 2019 Sartaj Khan Mumtaj Khan Pathan ... Petitioner Vs The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents ...

Mr. Prosper D'Souza Appointed for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & SANDEEP K. SHINDE JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 14, 2019 P.C. :

Heard learned counsel (appointed and the learned APP for the State.

Parole sought on the ground of illness of wife has been rejected due to the fact that the petitioner is convicted under Section 364A and 365 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and , therefore, bar under Rule 4(13) of the Maharashtra Prisoners' Furlough and Parole Rules is attracted.

The learned counsel (appointed) states that prisoner has put in actual imprisonment of more than 11 Shivgan 1/2

32-WP-45582019.odt years.

The learned APP states that till completion 14 years, request made cannot be looked into.

We are not inclined to consider this contention at this stage. Medical certifcate submitted by the petitioner is dated 11th March, 2018. Thus, period of more than 18 months has expired thereafter.

If the contingency arises, petitioner can submit fresh application with necessary documents. Hence, with this liberty and keeping all the contentions open, we dispose of the petition.

Order be communicated to the prisoner in jail. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) (B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Shivgan 2/2