Popat @ Dattatray Manmanth Menkudle And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 59.1855.18 aba.doc ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1855 OF 2018

1. Popat @ Dattatray Manmanth Menkudle.

.....Applicants

2. Sagar Shivai Pise

3. Aniket Shivaji Pise V/s.

The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent Mr. Jay S. Patil i/b Mr. Vikrant V. Phatate advocate for the applicant Mr. S. S. Hulke APP for the State CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE :

JANUARY 14, 2019.

P.C.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP.

Complainant has not supported the prosecution case in a statement recorded under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2 59.1855.18 aba.doc Apart from above, there appears to be some issue on the basis of employment qua operation of television cable networking. In the wake of above and for the reasons recorded in the order dated 11/09/2018, application stands allowed on the same terms. Application stands disposed of.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]