← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/11100/2015disposed off

Tulsidas Maruti Ursal v. Chetan Vijay Pradhan

2016-03-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.1 pages

wp­11100­15­(907)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11100 OF 2015 Tulsidas Maruti Ursal ..Petitioner Vs.

Chetan Vijay Pradhan ..Respondent Mr. A. U. Patil for the Petitioner CORAM :

R. M. SAVANT, J.

DATE :

2nd MARCH, 2016 P.C.

The above Writ Petition takes exception to the order dated 18­5­ 2015 passed by the Competent Authority exercising powers under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act 1999 (for short the said Act). By the said order, the application for setting aside the order passed on Exhibit 1, dated 29­ 1­2015 to proceed ex­parte against the Petitioner came to be rejected. The Petitioner can approach the Revisionary Authority established under Section 43 of the said Act for redressal of his grievance. Hence it is not necessary to entertain the above Petition. By relegating the Petitioner to the said remedy, the above Writ Petition is disposed of.

Needless to state that if any such application / proceeding is filed before the Revisionary Authority, the same would be considered by the Revisionary Authority on its own merits and in accordance with law. [R.M.SAVANT, J] mmj