Dr. Abdul Gafoor Junaidi v. Mr. Hariram Rahandomal Bhatia And ORS

14 wp 3263.17.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3263 OF 2017 Dr. Abdul Gafoor Junaidi ......Petitioner versus Mr. Hariram Rahandomal Bhatia and ors.

......Respondents Ms. Anusha P. Amin, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Purshottam Khandchandani, advocate for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

Mr. Jitendra Jagtap along with Mr. Ketan Gupta i/b. Legaleye Associates, advocates for the respondent No.5.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.SADHANA JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 29th AUGUST, 2017.

P. C. :

Ms. Amin, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, does not dispute that revision is maintainable against the order impugned in this petition. In that view of the matter, we are not inclined to entertain the petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. The petitioner, however, is at liberty to challenge the order impugned in the petition by way of revision.

2.

It is made clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter, and all rights and contentions of the respective parties are kept expressly open. In the event the petitioner files such revision, he is also entitled to take benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for the purpose of condonation of delay in filing the same. (SMT. SADHANA JADHAV, J.) [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 1/1