Sandip Ramesh Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra

(210)apeal-872-10.doc rkmore

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 872 OF 2010 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.416 OF 2018 Sandip Ramesh Gaikwad ..Appellant

Versus

The Sate of Maharashtra ..Respondent Ms. Jayshree Tripathi I/by Mr.Udaynath Tripathi, Advocate for the Appellant/Applicant.

Mr.H.J. Dedia, APP for the Respondent/State.

CORAM: B. R. GAVAI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE: 6th July, 2018 P.C.:- For reasons recorded separately following order is passed : Appeal is allowed.

The judgment and order of conviction and sentence in Sessions Case No.27 of 2010 dated 16th October 2010, imposed by the learned Trial Judge is quashed and set aside.

Appellant is acquitted of the charge charged with. 1/2

(210)apeal-872-10.doc The appellant is directed to be set at liberty forthwith, if not required in any other case.

Since the Appeal is allowed and disposed off, no orders are necessary in Criminal Application taken out therein and the same is also disposed off.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.) 2/2