Ravi Taneja v. CBI, Bs And Fc, Mumbai And ANR

upk wp-4079-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4079 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's Court's or orders or directions & Judge's orders.

Registrar's orders.

Ms.Archana Khan i/b H.N.Associates for the Petitioner.

Mr.S.K.Shinde a/w Mr.Yogesh M.Nakhawa for the Respondent No.1.

Mrs.S.V.Sonawane, APP for the Respondent No.2. ...

CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A.SAYED, JJ DATED : 25 AUGUST 2016 P.C.:

.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. The Petitioner has a remedy for applying for discharge before the Special Court. The Petitioner has invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India alongwith section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2.

As remedies are available to the Petitioner, we decline to entertain this Petition. In the event the Application for discharge is rejected, the Petitioner

upk wp-4079-15 will be entitled to urge all the contentions which are raised in this Petition while challenging the order refusing to grant discharge.

3.

By keeping remedies of the Petitioner expressly open and subject to above observations, we dispose of the Petition. All contentions on merits are expressly kept open.

(A.A. SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)