Usha Madhavrao Borgaonkar v. The Municipal Commissioner Of Gr. Mumbai And ORS

caw2621 ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2621 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3850 OF 2017 Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Ms Madhavi Kulkarni i/b Lobo Anthony for the Applicant Mr.Vinod Mahadik for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr.G.S.Hegde a/w Mr.C.M.Lokesh and Ms J. Pandey i/b A.R.Bhole & Co. for respondent No.3 CORAM :A.S.OKA AND M.S.SONAK,JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 22, 2017 P.C.

Time is sought on behalf of the applicant who is the writ petitioner.

The writ petition has been disposed of by order dated 19th April 2017 by upholding the contention that the petitioner has an alternate remedy.

Therefore, prayer clauses (a) and (b) seeking a direction to the City Civil Court to expeditiously dispose of a particular suit cannot be issued in a disposed of petition.

As far as prayer(c) is concerned, the same cannot be sought by way of a Civil Application.

caw2621 Subject to what is observed above, no relief can be granted in disposed of writ petition. Civil Application is disposed of.

(M.S.SONAK,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.)