Ishwara Dadu Patil And ANR. v. Shankar Lakshman Patil (Deceased Thr. Lrs)And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.888 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.889 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.890 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.891 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.892 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.893 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.894 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.895 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.896 OF 2016 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.185 OF 1999 Ishwara D. Patil & Anr.

... Applicants.

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Ishwara D. Patil & Anr.

...Appellants V/s.

Shankar L. Patil Since deceased through legal heirs 1A. Soabai S. Patil & Ors.

...Respondents.

Mr. Shrikant Yadav, Advocate for the Applicants in all applications.

Mr. B.A.Lawate, Advocate for R.Nos.4A and 4B in CA

888/16.

Mr. B.A.Lawate, Advocate for R.Nos.6A and 6B in CA 889/16.

Mr. B.A.Lawate, Advocate for R.Nos.9A to 9D in CA 890/16.

Mr. B.A.Lawate, Advocate for R.Nos.10A to 10C in CA 891/16.

Mr. B.A.Lawate, Advocate for R.Nos.12A to 12B in CA 892/16.

Mr. B.A.Lawate, Advocate for R.Nos.14A in CA 893/16. Mr. B.A.Lawate, Advocate for R.Nos.15A to 15C in CA 894/16.

Mr. B.A.Lawate, Advocate for R.Nos.16A to 16B in CA 895/16.

Mr. B.A.Lawate, Advocate for R.No.18A and 18B in CA 896/16.

CORAM : N.M. Jamdar, J.

Friday 17 June, 2016.

P.C. :- Civil Application No.888 of 2016 is filed since the applicants did not take steps for serving Respondent Nos.4A and 4B. Civil Application No.889 of 2016 is filed since the applicants did not take steps for serving Respondent Nos.6A and 6B. Civil Application No.890 of 2016 is filed since the applicants did not take steps for serving Respondent Nos.9A to 9D. Civil Application No.891 of 2016 is filed since the Applicants did not take steps for serving Respondent Nos.10A to 10C. Civil Application No.892 of 2016 is filed since the Applicants

did not take steps for serving Respondent Nos.12A to 12B. Civil Application No.893 of 2016 is filed since the Applicants did not take steps for serving Respondent No.14A. Civil Application No.894 of 2016 is filed since the applicants did not take steps for serving Respondent Nos.15A to 15C. Civil Application No.895 of 2016 is filed since the applicants did not take steps to serve Respondent No.16A and 16B. Civil Application No.896 of 2016 is filed since the applicants did not take steps to serve Respondent Nos.18A and 18B.

Heard learned counsel for the Parties. In all these applications, the learned counsel appears for the concerned respondents. Perused the applications. Sufficient cause is made out as to why applicants could not take appropriate steps. Accordingly, the order dated 15.7.2014 passed by the Registrar (Judl) is set aside and the applications stand restored as against the above mentioned concerned respondents. Delay in filing the applications is condoned. The learned counsel for the

concerned respondents stated above undertakes to file vakalatnama within a period of two weeks from today. (N.M. Jamdar, J.)