Ganesh Baliram Aatkale And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

(901) APPLN-543-17.doc BDP-SPS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 543 OF 2017 Bharat D. Pandit by Bharat D.

Pandit Date: 2019.11.29 17:23:18 +0530 Ganesh Baliram Atkale & Anr.

.... Applicants V/s Mahesh Vittal Aatkale and Anr.

.... Respondents.

None for the Applicants.

Mr. A.A. Palkar, APP for the State.

CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 2019 P.C.:- 1] This application was dismissed for want of prosecution initially on 21/3/2018. Thereafter, the said order was recalled and the Application came to be restored to file by an order dated 11/4/2019 and it was directed to be listed on board on 16/4/2019. On 16/4/2019, the Application came to be adjourned to 22/04/2019 at the request of the learned Advocate for the Applicants. On 22/4/2019, again at the request of the learned Advocate for the Applicants, Application came to be adjourned to 25/4/2019. On 25/4/2019 also, the learned Advocate for the Applicants sought adjournment and the matter came to be adjourned to 02/05/2019. 1/2

(901) APPLN-543-17.doc On 02/05/2019, the learned Advocate for the Applicants once again sought time and the matter came to be adjourned to 13/06/2019. The matter thereafter appeared on board on 20/11/2019. On 20/11/2019 since none remained present for the Applicants, this Court, in order to give one more chance to the Applicants, directed that the matter be listed on board on 21/11/2019 i.e. today for dismissal. 2] Today also, when the matter was called out, none appeared for the Applicants. In spite of indulgence shown on number of occasions, neither the Applicants nor their Advocate have remained present. 3] In view of above, it appears that Applicants are not interested in prosecuting the Application. As such, Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2