Mr. Mohan Gopal Shenoy v. Rajiv Mohan Mishra

cai165group ssp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.165 OF 2015, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.166 OF 2015, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.167 OF 2015, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.168 OF 2015, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2015, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.170 OF 2015, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.171 OF 2015, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.174 OF 2015, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.175 OF 2015, CIVIL APPLICATION NO.176 OF 2015 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.80 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr.Rajaram Vaman Bansode for the Applicants Ms Shyamali Godse a/w Mr.Ankit Kulkarni i/b Little & Co. for the Respondent No.2.

Mr.Sandeep Marne for respondent No.3 CORAM : A.S.OKA, & V.L.ACHLIYA,JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 16, 2015.

P.C.

.

Not on board. Taken on board.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned counsel for the second respondent, learned AGP for State. The learned counsel for the Mumbai Municipal Corporation is also present.

The grievance of the applicants

cai165group seems to be that an action of demolition is being taken without following due process of law. The direction of this Court in the PIL is that the action of demolition shall be taken in accordance with the due process of law.

Therefore, the remedy of the applicants is not by way of filing intervention applications but by way of filing a substantive proceeding. By granting liberty to the applicants to adopt remedy of filing substantive proceedings, the civil applications are disposed of.

(V.L.ACHLIYA,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.)