← Library
Bombay High CourtCRA/628/2018

Smt. P. Muthama, Thr. Poa. P. Selvan And ANR. v. Bhaikhan Sadullah Khan Mistry

2019-01-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar2 pages

CRA628_18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.628 OF 2018 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICAITON NO.687 OF 2018 IN C.R.A.NO.628 OF 2018 (P. Muthama w/o. P. M. Purgam through POA P. Selvam and another Vs. Bhaikhan Sadullah Khan Mistry) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances,Court's orders, or directions, and Registrar's Orders Court's or Judge's orders CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J.

DATE : 30TH JANUARY, 2019 P.C.:

None appears for the applicants. Even on 28.01.2019, none appeared for the applicants, and therefore, matter was adjourned till today under the caption 'for dismissal'.

2.

Advocate Vidhi Thaker applies for adjournment on the ground that applicants have engaged her and she has received papers only yesterday and she will be filing appearance shortly.

3.

As the Petition is already listed for dismissal, request cannot be acceded to. Hence, C.R.A. is dismissed in default. It is made clear that in case Application for restoration is taken out, applicants will proceed to argue the C.R.A. on merits on the premise that application for restoration is granted.

1/2

CRA628_18.doc 4.

In view of the dismissal of C.R.A in default, nothing survives in C.A.No.687 of 2018 and the same is disposed of as such.

(R. G. KETKAR, J.) Minal Parab 2/2