← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/1993/2019anticipatory bail granted

Vijay Kumar Awasthi And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2019-09-16Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere2 pages

ABA 1993-19.doc Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1993 OF 2019 1.

Vijay Kumar Awasthi .Applicants 2.

Ratna Vijay Kumar Awasthi 3.

Shweta Vijay Kumar Awasthi 4.

Ravi Kumar Awasthi 5.

Swara Ninad Chavan Vs.

1.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondents 2.

The State of Assam Mr. Nitesh J. Mohite, Advocate, for the Applicants Mr. P. H. Gaikwad-Patil, APP, for the Respondent - State

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

16.09.2019 P.C.

.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By this Application, the Applicants seek Transit Anticipatory Bail in connection with C. R. No. 148 of 2019 registered with the Mariani Police Station, Jorhat, Assam for the alleged offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code for a period of six weeks to enable the Applicants to take appropriate steps and approach the competent Court of law within the said period. The Applicants are resident of Mumbai and seek Transit Anticipatory Bail to approach the appropriate Court, for filing an appropriate Application seeking appropriate reliefs in the aforesaid C. R.

ABA 1993-19.doc 3.

Accordingly, the Application is allowed. The Applicants are granted transit anticipatory bail for a period of six weeks i. e. the Applicants shall not be arrested for six weeks from today to enable them to approach the appropriate Court for seeking appropriate reliefs, on the following terms & conditions :-

O R D E R

(i) In the event of the Applicants' arrest in connection with C. R. No. 148 of 2019 registered with the Mariani Police Station, Jorhat, Assam, the Applicants be enlarged on transit anticipatory bail, for a period of six weeks from today, on executing P. R. Bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- each, with one or two sureties in the like amount; (ii) During this period, the Applicants shall approach the appropriate Court and seek necessary orders.

4.

It is made clear that this Application has not been heard on merits.

5.

The Application is accordingly disposed of.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)