Chandragupt Sitaram Ghag And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 24-wp.3952.2017.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3952 OF 2017 Chandragupt Sitaram Ghag and Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr.A.V.Chatuphale, for the Petitioners.

Mr.K.V.Saste, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 9th JULY, 2018 P.C. :

1.

We are not in agreement with the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioners that permission could not have been sought by the Investigating Agency to investigate into a non-cognizable offence, after the registration of an FIR.

2.

We are informed by the learned APP that pursuant to the permission which was granted investigation was completed and a charge-

2/2 24-wp.3952.2017.doc sheet has been filed after obtaining permission of the concerned Court. 3.

We, therefore, do not deem this a fit case to exercise our Writ Jurisdiction. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (R. M. SAVANT, J.)