Jayantilal Vithaldas Pabari v. The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai.

22 caf 1630-14=.doc FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1630 OF 2014 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST). NO. 28828 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Preshita Pabri i/b M. J. Pabari for the applicant. Mrs. M. R. Bhoir for the respondent/Corporation. CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATED : 15/04/2015 P.C.:

.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

This application is filed by the plaintiff for condonation of 35 days delay in filing First Appeal challenging the the Judgment and Decree dated 07.05.2013 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court at Bombay in L.C. Suit No. 2958 of 2011.

The learned Counsel for the corporation vehemently opposed the present Civil Application. She submits that applicant has not shown sufficient cause for condonation of inordinate delay of 35 days.

Sneha Chavan 1/2

22 caf 1630-14=.doc Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the averments made in Civil Application, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out a case for allowing Civil Application.

Hence, the following order.

a) Delay of 35 days in filing First Appeal is condoned.

b) Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly.

(K.K.TATED, J.) Sneha Chavan 2/2