Shabnam Lalitkishor Tiwari v. The State Of Maharashtra

Tauseef

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1911 OF 2018 IN C.R. NO.I-148 OF 2018 Shabnam Lalitkishor Tiwari ...Applicant V/S.

The State of Maharashtra Respondent ...

Mr. Adnan N. Shaikh, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. J.S. Lohakare, APP for State.

Mrs. P.B. Muthe PI Chitalsar Police Station. - -

CORAM

: SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

DATE : 03 rd FEBRUARY 2020.

P.C. :

1.

Applicant is seeking his enlargement in Crime No.148 of 2018 registered with the Chitalsar Police Station, Thane for the offences punishable under Section 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code.

2.

It is prosecution case that for availing the Car Loan, applicant had manufactured and forged, her income certificate and defaulted the loan installment.

Pg 1 of 3

3.

On 18 September 2018 interim protection granted to the applicant is in force till date. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits, that the applicant has repaid the loan to the Bank except a equated installment of Rs.20,000/- which applicant shall pay on the due date. Statement is accepted. It has been submitted, in investigation, it was revealed that the Income Certificate produced by the Applicant, was not a forged document. Be that as it may facts of the case warrants no custodial investigation. Hence the following order.

ORDER

(i)In the event of arrest of the Applicant, he is directed to be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond for the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

(ii)The Applicant shall furnish the particulars of his residential address as well as permanent address and contact details to the investigating officer within seven days from the date of his release on bail;

Pg 2 of 3

(iii)The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or attempt to influence or contact the complainant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case;

4.

The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed off.

5.

It is made clear that observations made hereinabove shall be construed as an expression of opinion only for the purpose of granting bail and the same shall not in any way influence the trial in other proceedings.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) Pg 3 of 3