Anthony Vinod Pillai And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1/2 23-apl.1092.2018.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINALAPPLICATION NO.1092 OF 2018 Anthony Vinod Pillai and Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Ms.Prajakta Tole i/b Ms.R.R.Apte, for the Applicants. Ms.S.D.Shinde, A.P.P. for the Respondent No.1 - State. Mr.S.S.Karmarkar, for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 28th JANUARY, 2019 P.C. :

1.

The Applicants with their Advocate and Respondent No.2 with her Advocate are jointly requesting for quashing of FIR No.67 of 2015 dated 3rd March, 2015, under Sections 354(A), 452, 509, 506(1) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

The Respondent No.2 - Complainant has accordingly filed an affidavit before this Court.

2/2 23-apl.1092.2018.doc 3.

Learned A.P.P. upon instructions has produced a communication sent by Senior P.I, Mahim Police Station, to her office. It is taken on record as Exhibit - 'A'. It reveals 5 more offences against the Applicant No.1.

4.

Learned Counsel for the Applicants has attempted to urge that because of dispute with builder and two groups resulting there from the quarrels have taken place. We are not inclined to examine the correctness of this submission. It appears that in October, 2016, Applicant No.1 was also externed for a period of one year.

5.

We are therefore, not inclined to intervene in extraordinary jurisdiction. Hence, Rejected.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.