Sachin Chandrakant Dangat v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2. cri wp 3615-16.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3615 OF 2016 Sachin Chandrakant Dangat ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors ..

Respondents ...................

Appearances Mr. Mohsin Pathan i/by Mr. Rahul Arote Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. H.J. Dedia APP for the State ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE : OCTOBER 19, 2016.

ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] : 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 3.

The petitioner who is in Yerawada Central Prison preferred an application for furlough on 14.6.2016. The grievance of the petitioner is that though the application was jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2

2. cri wp 3615-16.doc preferred on 14.6.2016 and the police report is received, yet his application for furlough has not been decided. 4.

Looking to the above facts, it is directed that the application of the petitioner for furlough be decided within a period of three weeks from receipt of this order by the concerned authorities. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

[ MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2