← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12420/2022disposed off

Balasaheb Chandarrao More And ORS v. The State Of Maha. Thr. Prin. Sec. Dept. Of Co-Op And ORS

2022-11-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar,Hon'Ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh2 pages

TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Trupti 1 8-wp-12420-2022.doc TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2022.11.17 18:32:35 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12420 OF 2022 Balasaheb Chandarrao More and Ors.

...

Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...

Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 27313 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 12420 OF 2022 Sadashiv Bajirao Kokare & Ors.

...

Applicants

Versus

Balasaheb Chandarrao More and Ors.

...

Respondent .....

Mr.Kishor Patil with Mr.Jagdish G. Aradwad (Reddy) for the Petitioners.

Mr.Ranjit Thorat, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.S. Pawar, AGP for the State.

Mr.Rajesh N. Kachare for the Respondent No.6. Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni for the Applicants in IA. ......

CORAM :

NITIN JAMDAR AND SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE :

15 NOVEMBER 2022 P.C. :

By order dated 18 October 2022, we had directed the State Government to take a decision as regard the proposals sent by

Trupti 2 8-wp-12420-2022.doc Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 for amendment of bye-laws in respect of the Petitioners and villagers of 10 villages. The learned Senior Advocate for the State informs us that the proposal for amendment of bye-laws has been rejected.

2.

For this subsequent development, the Petitioners will have to take out independent proceedings as may be available in law. If such proceedings are taken out, then it would be considered on their own merits.

4.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. 5.

In view of disposal of the writ petition, the interim application does not survive and is accordingly disposed of. (SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)