Arumugum Arundatiyar v. The State Of Maharashtra
jdk 1 10.cri.appa.1304.15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1304 OF 2015 IN CRI. APPEAL NO. 1070 OF 2015 Arumugum Arundatiyar .. Applicant Vs.
The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....
Ms. Anjali Patil Advocate i/b Mr. Manoj R. Gowd Advocate for Applicant Mr. H.J. Dedia A.P.P. for the State ....
CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI ACTING C.J. & DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 11, 2016 P.C.:
The learned counsel for the applicant states that if the hearing of the appeal is expedited, she will not press this application for bail at this stage and if the appeal is not heard within a reasonable time, she seeks liberty to file a fresh application for bail. Hearing of the appeal is expedited. Application for bail is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
[ DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ] kandarkar