Rupali Aniket Koltharkar v. Bagmandle Education Society Through Its Secretary And ORS.

prod-31-wp-11955-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.11955 OF 2016 (Balance Production Board Dt.15/10/2016) Rupali Aniket Koltharkar

...Petitioner

vs.

Bagmandale Education Society and Others

...Respondents

Ms. Pranita Hingmire, for the Petitioner Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.

DATE :

OCTOBER 17, 2016 P.C.:

.

Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2.

Parties through their counsel.

3.

According to the Petitioner he had submitted a representation dated 21st September, 2016 (Exhibit F) along with the recommendation of the Management dated 4th October, 2016 before Respondent No. 4 in regard to the proposed decision as to declaring him as a surplus teacher.

Vishal Parekar 1/2

prod-31-wp-11955-2016.doc 4.

Today the only prayer made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner to dispose of this Petition by directing Respondent No. 4 to look into the Petitioner's grievance as reflected in the representation dated 21st September, 2016 (Exhibit F) along with the recommendation of the Management dated 4th October, 2016 and take appropriate decision on it.

5.

Having regard to the aforesaid limited prayer, this Petition is disposed of by directing the Respondent No. 4 to consider and take appropriate decision on the Petitioner's representation dated 21st September, 2016 (Exhibit F) as expeditiously as possible but not later than four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6.

Till the Petitioner's representation as aforesaid is decided the Petitioner be allowed to continue at his present place of posting. 7.

The Petition stands disposed of as such.

(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2