← Library
Bombay High CourtAO/1168/2013compromisedconsent terms

Ramesh Fatemal Tilokani v. Prakash Fatemal Tilokani And ORS

2015-02-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated2 pages

903 ao1168-13.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1168 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1389 OF 2013 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders.

Mr.R.R.Khosla for the appellant Mr.S.S.Shah i/b Mr.R.S. Chhapra for the respondent nos.1 to 4 Ms.Sujata Melekar for the respondent no.5

CORAM

: K.K.TATED, J.

DATED : 25/02/2015 PC:

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

Both the counsel state that matter is settled out of court. They tendered consent terms dated 25.2.2015. Same is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Undertaking given by Prakash Fatemal Tilokani, respondent no.1 dated 24.2.2015 also taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.

Both the counsel state that appellant as well as respondent no.1 is present in court. Undertaking given by appellant in consent terms in paragraph 2 Mohite 1/2

903 ao1168-13.doc as well as by respondent no.1 by separate affidavit cum undertaking is accepted.

Appeal from Order is disposed of in terms of Consent Terms. In view thereof, Civil Application does not survive. The same is also disposed of as infructuous.

(K.K.TATED, J.) Mohite 2/2