← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12655/2022disposed off

Sfc Environmental Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Assessment Unit Income Tax Dept Thr Pr. Commissioner And ORS

2022-10-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Valmiki Sa Menezes2 pages

906. WP 12655-22.doc Chittewan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.12655 OF 2022 SFC Environmental Technologies Private Limited 21st Floor, The Ambience Court, Sector 19D, Plot No.2, Vashi, Navi Mumbai-400 705.

...Petitioner

Versus

1.

Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Through Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai-6, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Churchgate, Mumbai-400 20 2.

Union of India Through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Government of India, Estrella Battery Compound, Labour Compound, Dharavi, Matunga, Mumbai-400 019.

...Respondents

*** Ms. Ritika Agarwal a/w Ms. Rachna Bhanushali i/b ACELEGAL for the Petitioner.

Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.

*** CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.

DATE : 21 OCTOBER 2022 1/2

906. WP 12655-22.doc Chittewan P.C.

.

The Petitioner challenges the Order of assessment dated 26 September 2022 under Section 143(3) read with Section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") on the ground that the same was passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, however, failed to justify as to how principles of natural justice had been violated in the present case. Although the Petitioner states that a show cause notice dated 14 September 2022 was issued as to why the proposed variation be not made and the Petitioner claimed that the response to the said show cause notice was fled, the same has been stated in general terms in the writ petition. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner failed to satisfy us as to the date on which, such response to a show cause notice was fled.

Even otherewise, we are of the opinion that since the order of assessment has already been passed, it would be appropriate for the Petitioner to avail the alternate remedy of an appeal. In that view of the matter, the Petition is dismissed. (VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.) (DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.) RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN RAJESH VASANT CHITTEWAN Date: 2022.11.