← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/12086/2016disposed off

Sunil Kashinath Albad v. State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Rural Development And Water Cons. Dept. And ANR.

2016-11-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar4 pages

1 29-44-wp-12086-12115.2016.sxw hvn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12086 OF 2016 Sunil Kashinath Albad ... Petitioner WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12087 OF 2016 Pandharinath Parvat Gavit ... Petitioner WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12088 OF 2016 Dilipo Baburao Thakare ... Petitioner WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12089 OF 2016 Vinod Ambadas Chavan ... Petitioner WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12090 OF 2016 Sitaram Motiram Thakare ... Petitioner WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12091 OF 2016 Dilip Savaliram Dalvi ... Petitioner WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12092 OF 2016 Sanjay Rajaram Bagul ... Petitioner WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12093 OF 2016 Nana Shivaram Dhumase and Ors.

... Petitioners WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12094 OF 2016 Chandrakant Sakharam Gavit ... Petitioner WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12095 OF 2016 Ganesh Motiram Mahale ... Petitioner

2 29-44-wp-12086-12115.2016.sxw WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12103 OF 2016 Parsaram Motiram Gare and Ors.

... Petitioners WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12110 OF 2016 Pandharinath Dattu Gode ... Petitioner WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12111 OF 2016 Hemraj Madhukar Pawar and Ors.

... Petitioners WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12113 OF 2016 Narayan Parashram Sahare and Ors.

... Petitioners WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12114 OF 2016 Subhash Tulshiram Nimbare and Ors.

... Petitioners WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12115 OF 2016 Manohar Shankar Chaudhari and Ors.

... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

... Respondents Mr. A.R. Kapadnis for the petitioners in all the matters. Mr. Sachin Chavan for R. No. 2.

Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for R. No.1.

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATED : NOVEMBER 24, 2016.

3 29-44-wp-12086-12115.2016.sxw P.C.

Not on board. In view of the urgency, taken on production board. Respondent no.2 has filed reply. The same be taken on record.

2.

Petitioners claim that they were ordered to be transferred from Zilla Parishad Kolhapur to Zilla Parishad, Nashik vide order dated 15.3.2013. Thereafter consent letter was issued on 10.6.2016 by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nashik. However, since the petitioners have not been relieved to join the transferred place, the petitioners had approached the Chief Executive Officer, Kolhapur for reliving them to join at the transferred place. However, since no orders have been issued on that representation, the petitioners have filed these petitions. 3.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent, Zilla Parishad Kolhapur submits that in view of some administrative difficulties, the order of relieving has not been issued.

4.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of this petition in terms of prayer clause (c ). While considering the petitioner's representation, the authority shall consider the law laid down by this court in the case of Lilabai Vasant Talekar Vs. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad,Pune in WP No. 5779 of 2014

4 29-44-wp-12086-12115.2016.sxw decided on 3/3/2015. Let the decision as aforesaid be taken on or before 8.12.2016. Writ Petitions are disposed of. 5.

Parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)