Indubai Wamanrao Shinde (Deceased) And Otehrs v. Shri.Pradip Laxman Shinde

Shridhar Sutar 1 508-cas-80-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2019 IN SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 28050 OF 2017 Indubai Wamanrao Shinde and others ... Applicants

Versus

Pradip Laxman Shinde ... Respondent .....

Mr. Vikram Sathe i/b Ms Yogita Deshmukh - Chitnis for the Applicants/Appellants.

Mr. Vaibhav R. Gaikwad for the Respondent.

.....

CORAM

: SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

DATE : 1st MARCH, 2019.

P. C.:

1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

The applicants/appellants seek condonation of 54 days delay caused in preferring the appeal.

3.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

4.

That, for the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned in terms of prayer clause (A).

5.

Civil application is allowed and disposed of. ( SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. )

Shridhar Sutar 2 508-cas-80-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL STAMP NO. 28050 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 79 OF 2019 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 81 OF 2019 [ Indubai Wamanrao Shinde and others ... Appellants

Versus

Pradip Laxman Shinde ... Respondent .....

Mr. Vikram Sathe i/b Ms Yogita Deshmukh - Chitnis for the Appellants/Applicants.

Mr. Vaibhav R. Gaikwad for the Respondent.

.....

CORAM

: SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

DATE : 1st MARCH, 2019.

P. C.:

1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

The parties to the appeal have compromised the dispute and recorded the consent terms on 5th February, 2019. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

3.

The parties to the appeal are personally present in the Court and they are identified by their Advocates. They admit the contents of the consent terms and their signatures. 4.

In view of this, Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of consent terms. Pending civil applications are also disposed of. 5.

Decree be drawn accordingly.

( SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. )