Aspi Deboo v. Mr Jamshed S Mistry And ORS

dgm 1 32-cao-45-17.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 45 OF 2017 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 24239 OF 2016 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.150 OF 1994 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 540 OF 1977 Aspi Daboo .... Applicant vs 1 Mr. Jamshed S. Mistry and ors.

.... Respondents Mr. Shashi Nair i/by Adv. Priyanka Vegad for the Applicant. Mr. Mino Framroze, legal heir of Gool Framroze/Respondent No.4, present.

CORAM: ANOOP V. MOHTA AND A. M. BADAR,JJ.

DATE : February 07, 2017 ORDER:

All Respondents are served.

This Application is taken out for condonation of delay in filing the Review Petition. We are concerned, at this stage, only with the delay in filing the Review. In view of the averments so made in paragraphs 2 to 7 and as sufficient case is made out, therefore, in the 1/2

dgm 2 32-cao-45-17.sxw interest of justice, Civil Application is allowed to the extent of delay in filing the Review. The delay is condoned.

No costs.

The Review Petition be listed for admission after four weeks.

The statement is made by Mr. Mino Framroze, legal heir of Gool Framroze/Respondent No.4, that his mother Mrs. Gool Framroze, Respondent No.4 and Respondent No.3-Mrs. Dina Dhabar, expired. The Appellant to take steps in accordance with law. (A.M. BADAR,J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) 2/2