Milind Hemraj Hingonekar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

(24)APPLNNo.7302015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.730 OF 2015 Milind Hemraj Hingonekar ...

Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents .....

None for the Applicant.

Mr.P.H.Gaikwad-Patil, APP for the Respondent/State. None for the Respondent No.2.

....

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

DATED : 4th OCTOBER 2018.

P.C. :

This an application for condonation of delay in preferring an application for leave to appeal by which the applicant seeks to challenge the Judgment and Order of acquittal of the respondent No.2 of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

None for the parties except the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State when the application is Gaikwad RD 1/2

(24)APPLNNo.7302015 called out for hearing. Record shows that the learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 has reported that the respondent No.2 has not imparted instructions to him.

Perused the application which is on affidavit. Averments therein are not controverted by the contesting respondents. Reasons stated in the application depict sufficient cause. Hence, the Order :

ORDER

(i) The delay in preferring an application for leave to appeal is condoned.

(ii) The application is disposed of accordingly. (A.M.BADAR J.) Raju Dattatraya Gaikwad Raju Dattatraya Gaikwad Date: 2018.10.06 16:09:44 +0530 Gaikwad RD 2/2