Maruti Raghunath Ghule v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

rpa 1/1 17-cp-379-13,wp-10398-12.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.379 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10398 OF 2012 Maruti Raghunath Ghule .. Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents ......

None for the Petitioner in both Petitions.

Mr.V.S. Gokhale, "B" Panel Counsel for Respondent - State. Mr.Abhijit P. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No.6 in both Petitions.

Mr.Ashok B. Tajane, Advocate for Respondent No.14 in WP 10398 of 2012.

......

CORAM : A.A. SAYED AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 27, 2019.

P.C. :

None appears for the Petitioners. The Writ Petition is dismissed for default.

Learned Counsel for Respondent No.14, has placed on record order dated 28th August, 2015 and contends that the Petition in any event has become infructuous. The Writ Petition as well as the Contempt Petition to stand disposed.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)