← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10608/2014disposed off

M/S. Pearl Containers Care v. Grocery Markets And Shops Board For Greater Mumbai, Thane And Raigad Districts And ORS

2016-10-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta3 pages

PVR 1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Writ Petition NO. 9479 OF 2013 M/s. Pearl Freight Services Pvt.ltd.

...Petitioner

Versus

Grocery Markets And Shops Board For Greater Mumbai And Ors

...Respondents

WITH Writ Petition NO. 9973 OF 2013 M/s. Pearl Containers Care

...Petitioner

Versus

Grocery Markets And Shops Board & Ors....Respondents WITH Writ Petition NO. 9974 OF 2013 M/s. Orient Cargo Services

...Petitioner

Versus

Grocery Markets And Shops Board & Ors. ...Respondents WITH Writ Petition NO. 10608 OF 2014 M/s. Pearl Containers Care

...Petitioner

Versus

Grocery Markets And Shops Board For Greater Mumbai, Thane And Raigad Districts And Ors

...Respondents

WITH Writ Petition NO. 10943 OF 2014 M/s. Pearl Freight Services Pvt Ltd

...Petitioner

Versus

Grocery Markets And Shops Board For Greater Mumbai, Thane And Raigad Districts And Ors ...Respondents

PVR 2/3 WITH Writ Petition NO. 10944 OF 2014 M/s. Orient Cargo Services

...Petitioner

Versus

Grocery Markets And Shops Board For Greater Mumbai, Thane And Raigad Districts And Ors

...Respondents

Mr.AVINASH K. JALISATGI with Mr.C.M.Lokesh, for the Petitioner in WP no.9479/13, WP 9973/13, WP 9974/13, WP 10608/14, WP 10943/14, WP 10944/14, WP 119/15. Mr.B.S.Mahamulkar with Mr.Rahul D. Oak, for Grocery Markets & Shops Board in all the matters.

Mr.V.N.Sagare, AGP for the State in all the matters. Mr.S.M.Katkar i/b. Mr.A.R.Belge, for Respondent No.4 in WP 9479/13, WP 9973/13, WP 9974/13, WP 10608/14, WP 10943/14, WP 10944/14.

---- CORAM :

ANOOP V. MOHTA & G.S. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE :

26th October, 2016.

---- ORDER :

1.

In pursuance of order dated 17 October 2016 the Grocery Markets and Shops Board for Greater Mumbai - Respondent No.1 has reconsidered the issue. The parties accordingly have arrived at a settlement. The learned Counsel for the parties have tendered consent

PVR 3/3 minutes of order which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. They are signed by the concerned Advocates and the concerned settling parties. There is no dispute on the signature. It is stated that the terms and conditions are also not contrary to the provisions of law and no third party is affected. 2.

The Writ Petitions are disposed of in view of this consent minutes of order. No costs.

(G.S.KULKARNI, J.) (ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)