Om Prakash Agarwal v. Karishma Consultants And ORS.

43-APPLN-584-14.doc 1/2 Ladda

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 584 of 2014 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 583 of 2014 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 585 of 2014 ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 586 of 2014 Omprakash Agarwal Vs. Karishma Consultant and others. Office notes, office memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court'sorders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr Ramesh Seth, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr A.R. Patil, APP for the State.

Mr N.K.Thakare i/by Ganesh Bhujbal for respondent No.1. CORAM : A.R.JOSHI,J DATE : 11th August,2015.

P.C. :

1) Heard rival submissions on all four applications for condonation of delay. There is delay of about 35 days in each matter in preferring the application for leave to file appeal challenging the acquittal of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in the matter of offence u/s 138 of N.I. Act.

1/2

43-APPLN-584-14.doc 2/2 2) For the reasons stated in the applications, delay is condoned. Application for leave to file appeal to stand over for four weeks. Applications for delay condonation are disposed of.

3) So far as the hearing on the admission of applications for leave to file appeal, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 stated that he has not been served with the notes of evidence in all four matters and they are not annexed to the applications / appeals. On this learned counsel for the applicant stated that he is ready with the notes of evidence and one set is being given to the learned counsel for the respondents in the court. He further placed one set of notes of evidence for the perusal of the Court. By consent stand over for four weeks for the hearing of the applications for leave to appeal. (A.R.JOSHI, J.) 2/2